[Bug 28008] [Shadow] Should "Events that are Always Stopped" include destination insertion points?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28008

--- Comment #5 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
Let me add a note in more reader friendly way here:


(1) "Events that are always stopped" are stopped at the boundary between the
*youngest* shadow root and it's shadow host.

(2) "Events that are always stopped" are *NOT* stopped at the boundary between
the older shadow root and the shadow insertion points in the younger shadow
root. 

This situation, (2), is very similar to the following situation:

(3) "Events that are always stopped" are *NOT* stopped at the boundary between
the child node, A, of the shadow host and A's destination insertion point.


In other words, the sub-path, from the youngest shadow root to it's shadow
host, is the only moment where an event is propagating from "Child Component"
to "Parent Component". 

(2) and (3) are not.

I might add this note to the spec itself as a non-normative note.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 08:07:57 UTC