- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:14:58 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26917 --- Comment #7 from Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> --- (In reply to Takeshi Yoshino from comment #6) > (In reply to Anne from comment #5) > > It seems your approach does not accomplish having an event every 50ms (but > > does accomplish the "least frequent" wording from the spec before). That > > also seems fine to me. > > I think it's fine, too. If one needs to do something based on the progress > every 50ms, he/she could save the progress from the progress event to > somewhere and invoke a repeated task using a timer where we do something by > looking at the saved progress. > > Otherwise, less frequency would be nice basically. By otherwise, I meant "if one doesn't need every-50ms dispatching". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2014 03:15:00 UTC