[Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

--- Comment #55 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
>"Being rendered":
>  <embed>
>  <object>
>  focusable
>  <applet>

Sadly, no.  These want different behavior in the "removed from document" and
"display becomes none" cases, iirc.  I think they may also want different
behavior in the "display has been none all along" and "display becomes none"
cases...

The rest sounds pretty reasonable at first glance except perhaps window.length
and named/indexed access on the window; that probably wants to be scoped to the
current subtree.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 22 November 2014 02:21:09 UTC