- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:18:08 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27325 --- Comment #6 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #4) > Not only to that, IMO. If we just randomly expose information about the > shadow DOM to the outside world, what is the use of shadow DOM. > > I consider this similar to > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=394327 though less > critical given that session history is rather > odd beast anyway. I agree about the priority. As for the use of shadow DOM, I would like for us to get on the same page. I tried to write the main goal here: https://gist.github.com/dglazkov/efd2deec54f65aa86f2e. This aligns closely with the thrust of the very early explorations of the problem: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Component_Model_Use_Cases#Layout_Manager In this perspective, exposing information or making Shadow DOM presence detectable is not as big of a concern. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2014 16:18:10 UTC