[Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

--- Comment #29 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> ---
(In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #28)
> That made me think about yet another case. Suppose that node #c (or #d) has
> a shadow tree, do we consider the shadow tree hosted by #c (or #d)
> *disconnected*?

The nodes in the shadow tree of #c or #d would be in a composed tree (with
document as root), since the host is such tree. 
So the shadow dom would be "in composed document" (D).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 10:17:16 UTC