- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 02:04:24 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dominicc@chromium.org --- Comment #11 from Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> --- Blink implementor feedback: Blink names the function after the Custom Element name. My thinking was it is helpful for the developer to have a hint about what the function relates to when playing with it interactively. It is not a valid JavaScript identifier, although for that matter [native code] is not a valid function body; I'm not sure what spec requires these names to be valid. >From this bug and feedback from our test suite submission authors apparently people expect the spec to have a requirement for this. I think it will not be a problem for Blink to implement a different name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 02:04:26 UTC