- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 17:06:09 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25590 Bug ID: 25590 Summary: Off-by-one in 3.2.6 effective overload set algorithm Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebIDL Assignee: cam@mcc.id.au Reporter: jsbell@google.com QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org In the "how to compute an effective overload set" algorithm: 7. While i ≥ 0: 1. If argument i of X is not optional, then break this loop. 2. Otherwise, add to S the tuple <X, t0..i−1, o0..i−1>. 3. Set i to i−1. 8. If n > 0 and all arguments of X are optional, then add to S the tuple <X, (), ()> (where “()” represents the empty list). In the loop at step (7), if i == 0, then in (7.2) either the syntax <X, t0..i-1, o0..i-1> is referencing negative indexes *or* this is adding <X, (), ()> to S, which is redundant with step (8). I believe this was introduced in: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/commit/97499d48855a9f9012fe145d49b83ccd71d1738b#diff-1feda49b40370635faef8b655f144f64L3228 ... where the previous version required 0 < i < n. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2014 17:06:11 UTC