- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 17:06:09 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25590
Bug ID: 25590
Summary: Off-by-one in 3.2.6 effective overload set algorithm
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebIDL
Assignee: cam@mcc.id.au
Reporter: jsbell@google.com
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org
In the "how to compute an effective overload set" algorithm:
7. While i ≥ 0:
1. If argument i of X is not optional, then break this loop.
2. Otherwise, add to S the tuple <X, t0..i−1, o0..i−1>.
3. Set i to i−1.
8. If n > 0 and all arguments of X are optional, then add to S the tuple <X,
(), ()> (where “()” represents the empty list).
In the loop at step (7), if i == 0, then in (7.2) either the syntax <X,
t0..i-1, o0..i-1> is referencing negative indexes *or* this is adding <X, (),
()> to S, which is redundant with step (8).
I believe this was introduced in:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/commit/97499d48855a9f9012fe145d49b83ccd71d1738b#diff-1feda49b40370635faef8b655f144f64L3228
... where the previous version required 0 < i < n.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2014 17:06:11 UTC