- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:23:12 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25086 --- Comment #12 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #9) > (In reply to Philip Jägenstedt from comment #2) > > https://codereview.chromium.org/203313002/ > > If attribute's value setter is really the only thing that requires the > reference to its parent element, maybe we should look into making it > readonly? The getter can need it to, since the Element's attribute be changed using setAttribute() after the Attr object is created. (This is assuming an Attr implementation that's just used for DOM bindings, i.e. that it isn't the same object that's used to actually store attributes internally.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 03:23:13 UTC