- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:25:23 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25914 --- Comment #30 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> --- (In reply to Arun from comment #29) > It's true that it could be a relative scheme, so I check for a relative > scheme per your advice. But, it will never be a relative URL; that is, the > recursive invocation of the basic URL parser will never also be fed a base > URL. So, host will always be extractable, since the emitter methods > (URL.createFor and URL.createObjectURL) will always emit a full origin > string, namely the effective script origin specified by the settings object. This is not true, e.g. blob:data:test would not have a host when recursively parsed. Anyway, of the algorithm you have now step 3 could be removed and then it seems fine. I'll look into defining the origin of URLs in the URL Standard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 08:25:25 UTC