[Bug 25994] invalid extended attribute list syntax

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25994

--- Comment #2 from Arun <arun@mozilla.com> ---
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #1)
> Note that the syntax of Exposed will likely change, since the current one
> can't be parsed unambiguously.


bzbarsky, will it change in a way that's very different than the suggested
correct syntax in the bug report by Glenn Adams? I admit I read WebIDL wrong,
and created two sets of square brackets, one for extended attribute annotations
and one for constructor. Should I leave this be till WebIDL decides on the
correct syntax?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 20:35:56 UTC