[Bug 26033] Make distribution algorithm forward compatible with <shadow> as function call.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26033

--- Comment #3 from William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> ---
(In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #2)
> If we bring "Let POOL be an empty ordered list" back to the spec, we'll get
> a forward compatibility for the future, however, we'll introduce the
> backward incompatibility from the current behavior.

That seems fine to me considering the spec is an editors draft right now.

> In either case, this doesn't affect the composed tree. Therefore, I think
> this is a minor issue.

This does affect the composed tree because I can put a <shadow> insertion point
in the youngest shadow tree. The spec change only neutered children of the
<shadow> element, it doesn't neuter the <shadow> element itself which means the
older shadow tree will be projected into it. Depending on how we distribute
nodes into the insertion points of the older shadow tree, different nodes will
appear in the composed tree.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:34:25 UTC