[Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

--- Comment #10 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
I think the previous classification is not good. The following might be better:

(1): A node is *in a Document*. The meaning of this doesn't change.

(2): A node is *in a shadow tree which participates in a tree of trees whose
root tree is a document tree*.

(3): (1) or (2). We might want to call it, "A node is in a tree of trees rooted
by a Document".

(4). A node is *in a composed tree whose root is a Document*.
     Note that a node can be ((3), but not in (4)) when a node is a child of a
shadow host, but the node isn't distributed to anywhere.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 07:18:51 UTC