[Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

--- Comment #4 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #3)
> Yes, but what will break if the definition of "in a Document" is changed to
> mean that (with s/element/node/, I assume).

Ops. An aggressive idea! I can't predict the impact of this change, however, I
like it. :) That should be *no impact*, I hope.

I just thought that there are some cases where we want to distinguish 'in a
Document' and 'in a composed tree whose root is a Document'.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 06:10:45 UTC