- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 19:38:59 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24867 Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonas@sicking.cc --- Comment #2 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> --- We should definitely add back :not(). My criteria for what goes and what stays is that we should only have selectors which depend on internal state of an element. That makes figuring out dependencies much more sane. :not() fits that criteria. We can certainly discuss having things like :nth-of-type etc. But lets do that as a separate bug, based on use cases and while documenting dependencies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 19:39:00 UTC