- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:13:40 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24848 --- Comment #2 from Morrita Hajime <morrita@google.com> --- (In reply to johnjbarton from comment #1) > It's not clear that ES6 will even allow > <module name="a"></module> > in normal HTML. So far their model is that modules are in files or they are > anonymous and not importable. > > Within an import, > import "oof" from './oof'; > may need some work on name normalization if the meaning is for the module > 'oof' to be relative to the HTML import rather than the baseURL of the host > document. Ah right. There is no way to define module name in plain ES6 module syntax so <module> + ES6 loader for browser or HTML imports need to define the mapping of module names somehow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 02:13:42 UTC