[Bug 22305] [imports]: Imports should be represented as Documents, not DocumentFragments.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22305

--- Comment #9 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> ---
Comment 0 raises three points. Base URLs we could do something about. E.g. "let
imported be a new DocumentFragment whose node document is ... and whose base
URL is ...". We should not (re)introduce xml:base, see bug 20976, but something
mostly static is fine. We can always provide more control later. (Also, not
having to support <base> and a bunch of other baggage documents come with seems
like a feature.)

Concurrent parsing is an issue either way it seems, given how we try to adjust
document.write() now.

In comment 8 you raise the point documents might have too much APIs, but
comment 0 is concerned about the lack of certain APIs. Do we have an idea what
is missing?

As for defining parsing, I assume we would use the same rules as innerHTML. See
http://domparsing.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-parse-fragment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 12:10:47 UTC