- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:58:46 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24318
Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cam@mcc.id.au
--- Comment #3 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> ---
(In reply to Anne from comment #2)
> I wonder if some of the inheriting should be expressed using IDL. That would
> make it easier for people to define new APIs.
E.g. if an interface has [Constructor] its associated global will be the one of
its interface object. If an object is returned by a member of another object
its associated global will be the same as that other object (with some kind of
exception for <iframe> I suppose). Or am I completely wrong here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 19:58:47 UTC