- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:04:31 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24087 Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[Custom]: Rename |[Custom]: Rename |document.registerElement to |document.register to |defineElement |registerElement --- Comment #7 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Maciej Stachowiak from comment #3) > Reopening to reconsider defineElement. Please don't rename the bug that already has a commit on it. Makes difficult to figure out what's happening. > > I gave a bunch of rationale on the list for why defineElement was better > than registerElement: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/1026.html > > Many people agreed, including Dominic from Google: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/1032.html > > The only rationale you gave for registerElement instead is this: > > Played with both. registerElement fit a bit better with the rest of the narrative. > > Can you please either adopt defineElement or give some substantive reasoning > for why my arguments are wrong? I don't find "played with both" or "fit > better with the rest of the narrative" very convincing. The "element registration is a process of adding an element definition to a registry": http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/#dfn-element-registration On the other hand, "Defining an element" (or defineElement) would be the act of constructing a definition, which doesn't quite hit the spot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 18:04:33 UTC