- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:04:31 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24087
Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[Custom]: Rename |[Custom]: Rename
|document.registerElement to |document.register to
|defineElement |registerElement
--- Comment #7 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to Maciej Stachowiak from comment #3)
> Reopening to reconsider defineElement.
Please don't rename the bug that already has a commit on it. Makes difficult to
figure out what's happening.
>
> I gave a bunch of rationale on the list for why defineElement was better
> than registerElement:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/1026.html
>
> Many people agreed, including Dominic from Google:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/1032.html
>
> The only rationale you gave for registerElement instead is this:
> > Played with both. registerElement fit a bit better with the rest of the narrative.
>
> Can you please either adopt defineElement or give some substantive reasoning
> for why my arguments are wrong? I don't find "played with both" or "fit
> better with the rest of the narrative" very convincing.
The "element registration is a process of adding an element definition to a
registry":
http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/#dfn-element-registration
On the other hand, "Defining an element" (or defineElement) would be the act of
constructing a definition, which doesn't quite hit the spot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 18:04:33 UTC