- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:17:17 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27222 --- Comment #11 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> --- (In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #9) > > > I don't see reason to special case <content> or <shadow>. > > The ordinal intended usage of shadow roots and insertion points are for > composition. Using them beyond the original role sounds bad unless there is > a strong reasonable demand from developers. Well, why they are then in the event path at all? I mean, given that they are in the event path, which is fine to me, and they are HTMLElements means that they have .title. Why explicitly prevent title to work? (Sounds like you want shadow dom to have closer to old XBL1's behavior after all where insertion point markers weren't in the anonymous DOM at all. The inserted DOM effectively replaced them. But that is not how shadow DOM works, do I'd prefer keeping things simple.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2014 12:17:24 UTC