- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:57:57 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27222 --- Comment #6 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> --- (In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #5) > I'm not a fan of using 'event path' here. An event path should not be > abused. No abusing here. Just being consistent how events propagate and you look for the first title attribute in the propagation path starting from the event target. > Using the ancestor chain in the composed tree should be enough, > shouldn't it? Well once the event propagation is fixed, event path and ancestor chain are effectively the same. I don't see reason to special case <content> or <shadow>. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 16:58:05 UTC