- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:32:13 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27569 Arkadiusz Michalski (Spirit) <crimsteam@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |crimsteam@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Arkadiusz Michalski (Spirit) <crimsteam@gmail.com> --- I proposed the same thing for the same reason some time ago to Anne (via email) but don't get any answer why not:), but happy that getElementById() was added and now we can use it in DocumentFragment. Summary I thought that is the reason: nobody want extend usage of old collection like HTMLCollection. But this change will be nice simplification for specs and using for newbie; still see a lot of questions why Document|DocumentFragment.getElementsBy* not work (the same was for getElementById()). Maybe now I can read reason why they can't be move to ParentNode. Of course moving to NonElementParentNode also looks good, maybe some days old jQuery disappear completely. But hmm: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23860#c4 BZ: [jQuery 1.2.5 assumes that any node it found in the DOM that has a "getElementById" property is a Document node. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=933193#c17} so moving getElementsBy* to ParentNode will breake jQuery to? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 15:32:15 UTC