- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:52:32 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
Bug ID: 27557
Summary: Consider introducing a prose-friendly way to refer to
enumerations
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebIDL
Assignee: cam@mcc.id.au
Reporter: annevk@annevk.nl
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org
Context:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27543
https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/
Perhaps we should standardize on a convention on how to reference an
enumeration value in a way that is not awful to read. Fetch currently maps /no
CORS/ to "no-cors" but that gets somewhat verbose. On the other hand, I'd
rather not use "no-cors" throughout the specification as that is harder to
read.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:52:34 UTC