- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:16:08 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26033 --- Comment #7 from William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> --- (In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #6) > Your proposal can't achieve that, can that? Shadow as function call can achieve what you are trying to do in your particular example by placing a content insertion point as a child of the shadow element. My proposal is a minimal change to ensure that the spec is forwards compatible with shadow as function call semantics. If you bring back the behavior, then that's even better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 August 2014 22:16:10 UTC