- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:35:46 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22141 --- Comment #18 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- Well, actually, the Shadow DOM spec doesn't define any technical definition of 'Shadow DOM'. That isn't well defined term. We should avoid using the term of 'Shadow DOM' in APIs. includeNodesInShadowTrees might be the most unambiguous, however it looks too redundant. My preferences are: - Most preferred - A. includeShadow B. includeShadowTrees C. includeNodesInShadowTrees D. includeShadowNodes - Least preferred - I don't have a strong opinion either. I am aware this might be bike-shed discussion, but the naming of API is important. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 25 August 2014 08:35:48 UTC