- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:04:23 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24288
William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |wchen@mozilla.com
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #2 from William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> ---
Reverting the (In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #0)
> It might be better to revert it to the old behavior until we find a
> reasonable idea of the implementation.
The behavior of the fix is not forward compatible with the behavior in bug
22344.
> We preserve the usage of child
> elements of the <shadow> elements for the future, such as enabling new
> behavior later again.
So we wouldn't be able to do this. ^
If the intention is strip functionality until you figure out a way to
reasonably implement the <shadow> as a function call, then you'll also have to
neuter <content> insertion points in older shadows.
Which means bringing back:
"Let POOL be an empty ordered list."
in
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commit/61745e0b40c8d609ad1070e7babc7915fca637ea
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 19:04:25 UTC