- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:09:14 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #6 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> --- (In reply to Robin Berjon from comment #5) > I'm happy to contact them if you think it helps. Yes please. > Well, I won't dispute that it's tough to get hard data on this, especially > since search engines drop the "<" and web corpora don't have much content. > Here's my experience for this: I spent a solid decade on XML support lists > and four years on a job that exposed me to schemata written by a wide > variety of other people which I had to make work with a tool I was > developing. I saw such elements regularly. The classic is an extension point > called a variation on <xmlContainer>. Books also had examples like that. OK. If so, more reason for XML Core to drop the reservation. > I understand the reasoning, but it actually cuts both ways: if XML Core were > to produce an element that contained a dash I think the feedback should be > "don't do that". Indeed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 10:09:17 UTC