- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 01:14:08 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25054 --- Comment #7 from Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> --- (In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #6) > So an implementation could just implement lockOrientation so that it never > rejects, but never accepts either. I'm not sure why you say that. The idea is to add a step 0 were lockOrientation would reject with "NotSupportedError" if locking is not supported. Otherwise, it should do business as usual. There should be no situation were a promise is returned but stay in a pending state for ever. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2014 01:14:10 UTC