- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:46:05 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23887 --- Comment #100 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> --- Hayato, Dimitri, I'd like to understand what are the issues in the approach explained rather clearly in comment 90. As far as I see it makes event path more logical, and consistent when comparing to event propagation in DOM in genenal, than the current spec since the top most shadow dom isn't handled in a special way, and yet it keeps event handling within all the shadow doms consistent. event.stopPropagation() should have the same behavior it has now in non-shadow-DOM. During capture phase things closer to the root node have priority over those closer to the target, and in case of bubble phase vice-versa. The spec doesn't current give that behavior , but the approach from comment 90 does. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 13:46:07 UTC