- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 21:34:17 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19936 Jan-Ivar Bruaroey [:jib] <jib@mozilla.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jib@mozilla.com --- Comment #5 from Jan-Ivar Bruaroey [:jib] <jib@mozilla.com> --- This would be useful for getUserMedia constraints, which has a WebIDL-compliant proposal on the table (full webidl is at the bottom): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2014Apr/0002.html In short, clients may specify both required and non-required constraints. E.g. { video: { facingMode:'left' } } is a non-required that the UA may ignore. Unfortunately, it becomes impossible to extend VideoFacingModeEnum with new types later, such as 'up' and 'down', without causing getUserMedia() to throw on old browsers because the "non-required" constraint wasn't recognized. The workaround is to use DOMString and merely refer to the enums in a comment. However, the syntax shown here looks promising and would have both implementation benefits (we could keep our lovely binding code, which does a lot of nice parsing for us and prevents us writing bugs), and documentation benefits (the documentation is expressly clear about what's needed, both to caller and implementer, and isn't reduced to prose by this largely backroom compatibility concern). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 21:34:19 UTC