- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 05:10:50 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23909 Gary Kacmarcik <garykac@google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |garykac@google.com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Gary Kacmarcik <garykac@google.com> --- (1) is the model that we have been using for all our key/IME discussions so far: the key event is sent to the webapp and then the IME If the key event is cancelled, the browser is supposed to make a best-effort to cancel the IME, but the spec is written to allow the case where the IME cannot be cancelled. Bug 23910 describes a "fix" to workaround bugs in poorly-written websites. The fix seems a bit hackish to me (and it only partially addresses the bug). While it seems OK to write the spec to allow this workaround, it seems very wrong to use this situation to drive larger spec decisions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 05:10:51 UTC