- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:40:05 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23369 --- Comment #11 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > When (in WebIDL) you write Uint8Array does that mean direct instances of the > corresponding ES constructor or does it also allow for instances of subclasses > of the constructor. I think the only sane thing is allowing subclasses. Right now webidl just talks about "objects implementing the interface" or some such, but we can formalize that as desired. And I think it's desired to formalize it in a way that makes subclassing work. As Anne, says, @@create inheritance makes this reasonable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:40:07 UTC