[Bug 20976] Define Node.baseURI properly

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20976

--- Comment #13 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
> So comment 8 seems to be proposing to reintroduce xml:base under a different
> name.

Not quite.  For example, the proposed behavior for relative URIs is radically
different from xml:base (which reevaluates them all the time against the
scoping base URI), and is much saner imo.

The dynamic update issues remain, of course.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 16:07:18 UTC