- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:07:09 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20976 --- Comment #13 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > So comment 8 seems to be proposing to reintroduce xml:base under a different > name. Not quite. For example, the proposed behavior for relative URIs is radically different from xml:base (which reevaluates them all the time against the scoping base URI), and is much saner imo. The dynamic update issues remain, of course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 16:07:18 UTC