- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 04:09:07 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hayato@chromium.org
--- Comment #5 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
I think we can simulate the proposed *contains()* in JavaScript by using
InsertionPoint.getDistributedNodes() and Node.getDestinationInsertionPoints().
I am aware that this will be burden for users, but it could be possible though
I've not tried.
I don't think it's good idea to change the semantics of existing contains(). It
should consider only a node tree and should ignore the status of the composed
tree.
I am not against adding something new in native Shadow DOM if we need it
absolutely.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 04:09:08 UTC