- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:18:40 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23565 --- Comment #12 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > In that case it would ideally be the same as cloneNode(undefined), right? Well, maybe. There may well be a web compat requirement here anyway, I just can't tell. Or put another way, I'm not willing to change the Gecko behavior to have cloneNode with no arguments do a shallow clone, because I'm worried about that causing compat problems at this point and I don't think theoretical purity is worth breaking compat in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 19:18:44 UTC