- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:19:30 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23564
Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cam@mcc.id.au
--- Comment #1 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> ---
So in particular, omitted would be true and undefined would be false.
It seems odd to define that via an overload. I guess TreatUndefinedAs might be
going away given that we do not need it elsewhere so maybe an overload is the
way to go, but then we do not want to spread overload usage either...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 11:19:35 UTC