[Bug 23416] Introduce new concept of neutered

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23416

--- Comment #10 from Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> ---
I do think that Blob should be a Transferable, and close() should be a
Transferable method, since the user-visible behavior of transfer and the
immediate-release of .close() are the same: the object is no longer accessible.
 However, that's a separate issue, and my argument here is narrower: the
concept of "this object is dead and inaccessible", aka neutering, should be the
same for both transfer and Blob.close() with identical effects (eg. throwing
exceptions on access and structured clone), and transfer is simply one user of
the neutering concept.

(Just clarifying a bit, so we don't tangent into the "should Blobs be
Transferable" discussion, which is related but orthogonal to this.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 5 October 2013 00:59:17 UTC