[Bug 22203] New: [Shadow]: It would be nice to have a general term which can specify either a document tree or a shadow tree.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22203

            Bug ID: 22203
           Summary: [Shadow]: It would be nice to have a general term
                    which can specify either a document tree or a shadow
                    tree.
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Component Model
          Assignee: dglazkov@chromium.org
          Reporter: hayato@chromium.org
        QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
            Blocks: 14978

A document tree and a shadow tree are used mutually exclusive in the spec.

Can we define a term that can specify either a document tree or a shadow tree?

In addition to that, can we define the relationship of trees using the terms of
(child, parent, descendant or ascendent) rather than (nesting, enclosing)?

Hopefully, that makes the spec simpler. For example, we can define an
*inclusive-ancestor tree* and use that in the spec.

WDYT?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 07:00:31 UTC