[Bug 21886] [Custom]: Define or link to what it means for a local name to be associated with an interface

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21886

--- Comment #9 from Scott Miles <sjmiles@chromium.org> ---
The nominal reason the last argument is a dictionary is to allow this kind of
API expansion, correct?

We are being clever with the 'can be a dictionary-with-prototype OR a class'
trick, but it seems less than ideal to have that affect the design.

In particular, if we come up with some other option, do we overload the API
further?

For these reasons, I'd be more inclined to let those options be static members
on the class.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 21:13:22 UTC