- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:10:32 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21886 Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sjmiles@chromium.org --- Comment #6 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #5) > It would have to be. I really don't like the magical "guess the name" APIs > in general. Proposal A seems like the way to go. If we're going with A, should the base element name be: 1) the second optional argument in document.register. The drawback here is that for some values of options.prototype, the argument is _not_ optional, which is somewhat confusing. 2) another option of ElementRegistrationOptions. The drawback here is that in ES6, this will be just a static class member, and then people will be asking, "why is that here?" And "why isn't name there as well?" Also adding Scott, who comes with opinions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 22:10:37 UTC