- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 13:18:41 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16000 Hallvord R. M. Steen <hallvord@opera.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hallvord@opera.com --- Comment #6 from Hallvord R. M. Steen <hallvord@opera.com> --- > Why isn't it acceptable? Please provide a concrete reason. IMO the reason is that the getResponseHeader() / getAllResponseHeaders() part of the spec is basically about documenting the implementations that already exist (and have existed for many years now). I don't think there is much compat risk from existing content if we change them, but it's still troubling to introduce a potential not-easily-discoverable incompatibility between browsers by requesting a change in an API that's considered stable. IMHO a new, easily discoverable method would be better for authors here (when such discoverability matters will always be a judgement call, BTW). Test (asserting that current non-spec'ed behaviour is correct): http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/submissions/103/XMLHttpRequest/getresponseheader-chunked-trailer.htm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 13:18:56 UTC