- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 08:46:42 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15417 Hallvord R. M. Steen <hallvord@opera.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hallvord@opera.com --- Comment #3 from Hallvord R. M. Steen <hallvord@opera.com> --- > maybe we should also expose something like responseURL in case > there is no document, but you want to resolve relative URLs in say, JSON? -1 - it does not feel "natural" to me to resolve URLs that are not in a "document" according to the resource's URL. (On the other hand, I've often wanted something like an xhr.requestURL property for debugging..sometimes while stepping through code one might come across an XHR object reference and need to know what URL it was used for. There are workarounds, but they are clunky.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 08:46:47 UTC