- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 03:49:11 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21887 Bug ID: 21887 Summary: [Custom]: Add a note about using TYPE and NAMESPACE to identify definitions despite NAMESPACE being redundant Classification: Unclassified Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Component Model Assignee: dglazkov@chromium.org Reporter: dominicc@chromium.org QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org Blocks: 14968 The steps for register say "If there already exists a definition with the same TYPE, throw a NotSupportedError and stop." This means that TYPE uniquely specifies a definition. However when referring to definitions, the spec usually (always?) refers to them by TYPE and NAMESPACE. For example, this from parsing: "Let ELEMENT be the result of creating a node implementing the interface appropriate for the element type corresponding to TYPE and NAMESPACE" I agree that this "TYPE and NAMESPACE" is a convenient way to sneak in a namespace check without complicating steps with explicit exits for mismatched namespaces. However it would be nice if there was non-normative language pointing out that the spec does this and there is this implicit namespace checking going on all over the place, which when it fails, is the same as a definition not being available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 03:49:12 UTC