- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:55:59 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21389 Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dominicc@chromium.org --- Comment #1 from Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> --- I think this should be :scope and not :root. As you can see in the scoping section of the CSS4 Selectors spec [1] "The :root pseudo-class, however, still only matches the actual root of the document." even when doing a scope-contained selector. Perhaps we can use :scope [2] for this, with the awkwardness that the ShadowRoot now becomes addressable despite not being style-able, and you have to write content::distributed(:scope > .foo .bar) to mean what you want. [1] <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#scoping> [2] <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#the-scope-pseudo> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 00:56:05 UTC