- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:55:59 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21389
Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dominicc@chromium.org
--- Comment #1 from Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> ---
I think this should be :scope and not :root.
As you can see in the scoping section of the CSS4 Selectors spec [1] "The :root
pseudo-class, however, still only matches the actual root of the document."
even when doing a scope-contained selector.
Perhaps we can use :scope [2] for this, with the awkwardness that the
ShadowRoot now becomes addressable despite not being style-able, and you have
to write content::distributed(:scope > .foo .bar) to mean what you want.
[1] <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#scoping>
[2] <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#the-scope-pseudo>
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 00:56:05 UTC