- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:25:57 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17681
Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #7 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> ---
Reopening. This bug was specifically about specifying order between all
exception types. I agree that generally it doesn't matter which exception is
thrown, but if we don't think that should be defined, then we should mark this
bug WONTFIX rather than FIXED.
I do think it would be good to define all exception orders though.
One way to do it would be to have a global list that defines some sort of
priority based on exception type. So if both a TransactionInactiveError and a
ReadOnlyError test is failing, we always throw ReadOnlyError. And if
ReadOnlyError and DataError both are possible, then we throw DataError.
Or something like that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 16 March 2013 11:25:58 UTC