[Bug 21073] merge [Unforgeable] and readonly into unforgeable

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21073

--- Comment #3 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
But in general there is no reason to restrict unforgeable to readonly
properties; it can make sense for operations and writable properties too, as
the Location example shows.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 15:47:57 UTC