[Bug 19470] Event firing sequence on abort() after send()

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19470

--- Comment #11 from Dominik Röttsches (drott) <dominik.rottsches@intel.com> ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Agree on NOT removing the events dispatched from steps 5-7 of <a
> href="show_bug.cgi?id=19470#c0">comment 0</a>.
> 
> Anne,
> In order to allow that, shouldn't the step 3 in <a
> href="http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#the-abort()-method">abort() algorithm</a>
> be put under step 4 as a sub step? (because progress, load, loaded would be
> already in task queue by that time?)

Are the events from step 8-9 of 
http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#the-send()-method actually going to a task queue?
Is the "queuing to a task queue" implicit here? I am asking because there is no
explicit "_enqueue_ firing an event xyz" there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 10:20:39 UTC