- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:11:14 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20941 Bug ID: 20941 Summary: Treewalker previousNode algorithm seems wrong Classification: Unclassified Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DOM Assignee: annevk@annevk.nl Reporter: bzbarsky@mit.edu QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, www-dom@w3.org I was comparing http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-treewalker-previousnode to the corresponding Gecko code, and the Gecko code has one difference: Step 2 substep 2 has an additional subsubstep: 5. Set "sibling" to the previous sibling of "node". I believe the Gecko code is correct and the spec is wrong, since step 2 substep 2 says "While sibling is not null, run these subsubsteps:" but the subsubsteps do not change the value of "sibling". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 10 February 2013 02:11:17 UTC