- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:19:43 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21066 --- Comment #22 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #21) > > (In reply to comment #19) > > Metapoint: It sounds like when we have time we should start looking into > > what parts of Shadow DOM should move into DOM proper and what parts need to > > be described elsewhere. Though that depends on how stable the proposed > > Shadow DOM API is in general of course. BTW, I think the easy steps here are: 1) in DOM spec, add event.path and simply say that it returns a copy of the event path 2) in shadow DOM spec, tweak event handling section to explicitly mention that it modifies how an event path is built. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 18:19:49 UTC