- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:42:33 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21066 --- Comment #21 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #20) > Fwiw, I agree with Hayato-san. > > I worry that the 'event.path' emulation code will become boilerplate that > many components will include. I am convinced. (In reply to comment #19) > Metapoint: It sounds like when we have time we should start looking into > what parts of Shadow DOM should move into DOM proper and what parts need to > be described elsewhere. Though that depends on how stable the proposed > Shadow DOM API is in general of course. Anne, I totally agree. Can we maybe discuss this at TPAC tomorrow/Friday? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 16:42:35 UTC