- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:50:07 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21066
Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dominicc@chromium.org
--- Comment #14 from Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Given:
> <a>
> <d>
> SR
> <b>
> <content id="a">
> SR
> <c>
> <content id="b">
>
> The unflattened tree is:
>
> <a>
> <b>
> <c>
> <content id="b">
> <content id="a">
> <d>
>
> In the current implementation of insertionParent in blink, the
> insertionParent of <d> is content#b. Thus, one cannot see content#a in the
> event path. Perhaps we need a more precise definition of insertionParent.
The implementation in Blink seems wrong to me. I think <d>.insertionParent
should be #a; #a.insertionParent should be #b; and all other .insertionParent
null.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:50:08 UTC